View Single Post
Old 02-12-2018, 06:48 PM   #49
JiuJitsuFighter
Tiny Tot Dancer
 
User InfoThanks / Tagging InfoGifts / Achievements / AwardsvBActivity Stats
JiuJitsuFighter is an unknown quantity at this point
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: California
Posts: 61
Credits: 0.00
Savings: 0.00
Quote:
Originally Posted by OLChemist View Post
Do you have any idea just how offensive the above is?

Tribal enrollment criteria are established by the tribes not the feds. Tribes have always had methods by which they determined membership -- even before the lost white guy. Exercise of this control over their membership is an aspect of tribal sovereignty. Sovereignty matters in Indian Country. Sovereignty is the firewall against political and cultural extinction.

Whether or not you like the criteria is one thing. There is a place for legitimate discussion of the implications of various means of determining membership. There is a legitimate place for discussion tribal naturalization. But, comparing tribal citizens -- that is what enrolled people are -- to dogs is not constructive. It's practically a page out of the dominant culture termination playbook.

Again, "hechel lena oyate kin nipi kte." Be careful. Be mindful. Community first, individual second. We i'eska have to remember, we too have a duty to protect what we are claiming. Our enemies listen to this kind of talk and vote with it in mind.
Hey, your right. Iím Sorry.
JiuJitsuFighter is offline   Reply With Quote Share with Facebook