Register Groups Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Forum Home - Go Back > General > Native Life > Native Issues Lester: Indian rights of way and echoes of  the 19th century Lester: Indian rights of way and echoes of the 19th century

Reply LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 04-02-2006, 05:27 AM   #1
Honey Connoissuer
 
Blackbear's Avatar
 
User InfoThanks / Tagging InfoGifts / Achievements / AwardsvBActivity Stats
Blackbear has a reputation beyond repute
Blackbear has a reputation beyond reputeBlackbear has a reputation beyond reputeBlackbear has a reputation beyond reputeBlackbear has a reputation beyond reputeBlackbear has a reputation beyond reputeBlackbear has a reputation beyond reputeBlackbear has a reputation beyond reputeBlackbear has a reputation beyond reputeBlackbear has a reputation beyond reputeBlackbear has a reputation beyond reputeBlackbear has a reputation beyond reputeBlackbear has a reputation beyond reputeBlackbear has a reputation beyond reputeBlackbear has a reputation beyond reputeBlackbear has a reputation beyond reputeBlackbear has a reputation beyond reputeBlackbear has a reputation beyond reputeBlackbear has a reputation beyond reputeBlackbear has a reputation beyond reputeBlackbear has a reputation beyond reputeBlackbear has a reputation beyond repute
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Alaska
Posts: 9,817
Credits: 546.23
Savings: 1.00
Lester: Indian rights of way and echoes of the 19th century

************************************************** ******************
This Message Is Reprinted Under The FAIR USE
Doctrine Of International Copyright Law:
_http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html_
(http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html)
************************************************** ******************
FROM: INDIAN COUNTRY TODAY NEWSPAPER

_http://www.indiancountry.com/content.cfm?id=1096412740_
(http://www.indiancountry.com/content.cfm?id=1096412740)

Lester: Indian rights of way and echoes of the 19th century

(javascript:PrintWindow();) Posted: March 31, 2006 by: _A. David Lester_
(http://www.indiancountry.com/author.cfm?id=554)

In 1532, Spanish theologian Franciscus de Victoria prevailed in a
vigorous debate over the rights of the peoples of the New World that Indian tribes
should not be deprived of their land without their consent. Exacting a tribe's
consent, therefore, was required by the Spanish and subsequent European
colonial powers if Indians were to be separated from their valuable lands and
assets.

This doctrine was adopted by the new American republic as reflected in the
U.S. Constitution and in the Indian Intercourse Acts of the first Congress in
1790. The approval of the federal government was also made a requirement to
prevent states and private speculators from securing tribal lands under
fraudulent circumstances. As we all know, treaties, compacts and other agreements
formed the legal basis for the transfer of hundreds of millions of acres of
land in what has become the United States.

Indian lands not transferred to the federal government under treaty became
known as Indian reservations. These lands were reserved as homelands for the
exclusive and undisturbed use of the Indian people and their tribes. This
principle continued even as federal policies vacillated between removal and
extermination, to assimilation and the official termination of the status of
Indian nations as entities with legal and political authority.

In its 1969 report entitled ''Disposal of Rights in Indian Tribal Lands
Without Tribal Consent,'' the House Committee on Government Operations affirmed
the 445-year-old legal principle that ''Indian tribes should not be deprived
of rights in their land without their consent'' and in so doing rejected a
proposal by then-Secretary of the Interior Stewart Udall to do away with tribal
consent in granting rights of way over tribal lands.

In 2005, Congress approved the comprehensive Energy Policy Act of 2005. The
act included Title V, the ''Indian Tribal Energy Development and Self
Determination Act,'' designed to assist willing tribes to develop their own
renewable or non-renewable conventional energy resources or to use their lands for
the purposes of electric power generation or as transportation corridors for
electricity, natural gas and other energy products by delegating certain
federal approval authority to the tribe. Title V provides powerful incentives for
willing tribes to develop their resources on their own or in collaboration
with their energy sector partners to undertake energy projects benefiting the
tribe, its members, the local communities, and our nation by increasing both
the diversity and quantity of energy supply.

Unfortunately, the act also contains section 1813, which mandates a study on
rights of way across Indian lands for energy purposes. The study is to be
undertaken by the departments of Energy and Interior, and a report and
recommendations are due to be submitted to Congress this August. The unspoken premise
of the proponents of the study is that removing tribal consent from the
rights-of-way equation is a legitimate objective and an appropriate exercise of
Congress.

On March 7 and 8, the departments held a ''scoping meeting'' with energy
company officials and elected tribal leaders and their representatives, and
heard the perspectives of the attendees on a wide range of topics that included
the necessity of undertaking such a study at all, the amount of material that
needs to be collected and analyzed for an accurate portrayal of the issues,
and - perhaps most important from the tribes' perspective - the fundamental
interest tribal governments have in preserving their legal prerogative to give
or withhold their consent on the use of their lands.

What has become clear in recent months is that because of some tough
negotiations with Indian tribes over rights of way, some in the energy sector are
fearful that - unless restrained by the federal government - tribes will seek
levels of compensation that ''could'' disrupt the flow and security of our
nation's energy supplies. This, notwithstanding the fact that no disruption in
energy supplies has ever occurred due to failed negotiations with an Indian
tribe. Let me repeat that: No disruption in energy supplies has ever occurred
that was due to unreasonable negotiating demands of an Indian tribal
government.

While the factual basis giving rise to the section 1813 study is weak, it
seems plain to me that what we are witnessing is in fact the exercise of
political power by at least one energy company with the objective of placing
federal price controls on the value of tribal lands (i.e., the compensation due an
Indian tribe for a right of way) for as long a period as possible, with the
goal of fixing its costs while maximizing profits. This is especially true if
the future build-out in terms of domestic energy infrastructure, production,
transportation and transmission meets expectations.

It is strange that a private-sector interest with as vigorous a market
performance as the energy industry, and which vigorously opposes government
intervention over its operations, would seek to place them on Indian tribes. But,
as was the case with domestic steel in restricting cheaper foreign steel, I
suppose ''bad interventions'' are those that would cap energy prices to the
consumer and ''good interventions'' are those that fix their Indian
rights-of-way costs.

At the Denver sessions, the putrefied odor of an outdated ideology entered
the debate during the remarks by the spokesman for a renowned property rights
organization that strongly opposes government use of eminent domain over
private property. Evidently, the organization has had a change of heart when it
comes to government power over tribal lands because the spokesman argued that
the tribal interest should give way to that of a private pipeline company
when it comes to energy rights of way. How convenient changes of heart can be.

These and other tactics, charging that Indian tribes ''could'' distort the
energy markets and cause havoc to America's economy and jeopardize American
energy security, are not new. One is left to imagine the beleaguered energy
industry bravely crossing Indian lands, seeking government protection from the
hostile Indians that threaten ambush at every step along the perilous trail.

In one sense, Indian tribes welcome the section 1813 study because we know
it will show Congress and the American people that for years, Indian lands
were seriously undervalued by the federal trustee when it controlled the
granting of rights of way. The study will also show that, far from being a problem
that has negatively impacted western U.S. energy markets, Indian lands and
resources have helped fuel our nation's economic and demographic growth by
providing reliable and secure energy supply.

A. David Lester is the executive director of the Denver-based Council of
Energy Resource Tribes, an organization of 57 federally recognized energy
resource Indian tribes.
__________________
Don't worry that it's not good enough for anyone else to hear... just sing, sing a song.
Blackbear is offline   Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
Sponsored Links
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

    

Join the online community forum celebrating Native American Culture, Pow Wows, tribes, music, art, and history.

Join PowWows.com Today!

Your Guide to Native American Pow Wows Since 1996

Register For Free

Enjoy the benefits of being a member of PowWows.com!

Join our Native American online community focused on Pow Wow singing, dancing, crafts, Native American music, Native American videos, and more.

Add your Pow Wow to our Calendar

Share your photos and videos

Play games, enter contests, and much more!






New Threads

Pow Wow Calendar Search

 
Month: Year:

Location:
Facebook Profile Images

Videos

Featured Articles

Dance Styles

Crafts

Gallery