Originally posted by John Cornsilk
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Congress tells Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma: No Funding
Collapse
X
-
CNOT-sucking fool!!
Originally posted by Josiah View PostOh but that is not true! because in this case the Government is saying it is up to the TRIBAL COURT to decide
hmmm
Well if it is up to the Tribal Court to decide, the simple fact is they have, decided already, the Supreme Court of CNOT rulled the 6th of March 2006 See the order here allendecision
And then folks if you seriously wnat to know or simply learn the truth you could start with a visit to this site Cherokee Nation Sells Out I respond to a pretty good article there and with some links to documents for corroboration, and if you need more go to cornsilks.com,.
John Cornsilk
-
👍 1
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by Zeke View PostSo they should have assimilated or be consigned to Natural Selection?
Where have I heard that argument, before?
The Cherokee disavowing of Freedmen is hypocritical, at best.
However of all the tribes to be accused of exclusivity
That takes the cake
It is a believe across Ndn country all you have to be is 1/1 millionth and that makes you Cherokee
Arghhhhhhhh
Here we go with blood quantum again
The Tribal governments only have two maybe three solutions to this problem
1) Blood Quantum only 1/4 or more is enrolled Only one tribe counted...
2) Decendancy to an ancestor
3) Start all over and make everybody Fullblood
With the Freeman it is a different issue
Some Cherokee own and brought slaves with them when everybody was removed and some where just scooped up when we were kicked out of Georgia
After the Civil War the Cherokee Nation were forced to sign another treaty granting freedom to the former slaves.
Since the Cherokee Government was the only ruling authority in Indian Territory they were granted Citizenship and the right to vote with that Government.
This was all dissolved in 1907 when the Cherokee Nation was disbanded and all its Citizens were disbanded
The ones with Indian blood were given an allotment and the ones that were freeman were given nothing since they were not Indians by ruling of the government (US GOVERNMENT)
In 1924 all were given Citizenship in the United States.
In 1974 the Cherokee Nation reformed and ratified its New Constitution with one of the provisions was that to be a citizen of the Nation you had to show decendancy to a Cherokee by Blood
So were we suppose to take care of the Freedmen Forever???
That is for the Courts to decide...
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by Josiah View PostThe rest that intermarried with Cherokees dont have this problem only the ones that chose to remain seperate over the years... only 2687 left now
Where have I heard that argument, before?
The Cherokee disavowing of Freedmen is hypocritical, at best.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Update to this Story
Congressional members meet with BIA director about Freedmen issue
Main NEWS Section - Cherokee Nation
Tulsa, Oklahoma (AP) 3-08
Members of Congress plan to send a letter to the director of the Bureau of Indian Affairs seeking clarification on the status of the Cherokee Nation Freedmen descendants and why the agency has not done more to end the controversy.
Four lawmakers, including U.S. Rep. Diane Watson, met during late March with BIA director Carl Artman.
Watson, D-Calif., has been the most vocal congressional critic of the Cherokee Nation and its efforts to deny citizenship to descendants of former slaves. She said the tribe and the BIA need more oversight on the issue and told the Tulsa World’s Washington bureau that she is concerned the Freedmen descendants are being treated as temporary members of the tribe.
They are not being issued cards they could use to receive certain benefits, she said.
“From what I understand they haven’t issued one,” Watson said.A tribe spokesman said the descendants still have access to services.
Another issue raised at the meeting with Artman involved what some see as different approaches by the BIA on the issue with the Cherokee and Seminole nations.
Watson has introduced legislation to strip the Cherokee Nation of its federal funding to get the tribe to give up on its efforts to rescind citizenship of the Freedmen descendants.
Last year, nearly 77 percent of Cherokee voters decided in a special election to amend the nation’s constitution to remove the Freedmen descendants and other non-Indians from tribal rolls.
Critics of the vote, however, noted that only 9,000 of the tribe’s 270,000 membership cast ballots.
Critics of the vote, however, noted that only 9,000 of the tribe’s 270,000 membership cast ballots.
Reps. John Conyers, D-Mich., chairman of the House Judiciary Committee; Barney Frank, D-Mass., chairman of the House Financial Services Committee; and Mel Watt, D-N.C., a key player on the issue for the Congressional Black Caucus, also attended the meeting with Artman.
Nedra Darling, a spokeswoman for Artman, confirmed that the meeting with the four lawmakers took place but said some of the issues raised by the lawmakers should be addressed by the Cherokee Nation.
As for the Seminole Nation, Darling said that tribe sued the BIA over the Freedmen descendants issue and did not have its own court system, unlike the Cherokee Nation.
Last year, Artman said an 1866 treaty between the United States and the Cherokee Nation affirmed the citizenship rights of the Freedmen, adding that the government would consider taking the tribe to court to make sure it lives up to that treaty.
Cherokee Nation spokesman Mike Miller said the 2,867 Freedmen descendants who were reinstated last year pending the outcome of ongoing litigation continue to receive health care and other services. They also have the right to vote, Miller said.
“CDIB cards are given out by the U.S. government,” he said. “Only people who can show documentation of degrees of Indian blood can receive them by federal law.”
Senator Watson does not even understand her own Federal Government's system of CDIB's!!!
She thinks that the Cherokee Nations is suppose to issue them to these people but then they are not Ndn
The rest that intermarried with Cherokees dont have this problem only the ones that chose to remain seperate over the years... only 2687 left now
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by Josiah View PostTime to get this thread back onto the issue at hand
I know I know
Lots of finger pointing and yelling, name calling and hurt feelings
Sounds like another day in the trenches
I sat down and read H.R. 2824 which is the bill currently in the House of Reps sitting in committee
I read the whole document all the way to the end and will post it on here for you reading
It is very interesting reading
Here are the Highlights
1) It is a heavy handed way of getting the Cherokees back in line by removing all federal funding,Removing the ability of the tribe to continue its gaming operations so punishing the whole entire tribe by shutting down all funds for Schools, Hospitals ect.
2) Gives all Freedmen the right to SUE the Cherokee Nation the Dept of Interior separately or both
3) Gives the Government the right to hear Civil Rights violations which also could lead to Suits against the Cherokee Nation and or the Dept of Interior
4) If passed would also compel all other of the 5 civilized tribes to check on there Freedman status to make sure they are in compliance.
5) Has some very distrubing and Historically inaccurate information regarding the Cherokee Nation involvement during the Civil War by saying that all Cherokees were confederates and thus Slaveowners and were punished by the treaty of 1866 and this is just another case of southern politics
Thus we are racist exslave owners out to get the freedman back according to this bill!!!!!!
Holy Crap
Read the Bill
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-...2824ih.txt.pdf
John Cornsilk
Leave a comment:
-
-
Cherokee Nation is so corrupt
Well, Josiah, we're not the racists but our current administration is. Most of the Cherokees didn't even vote, but the small percentage who did voted to get rid of the freedmen. And Cherkoee Nation always cheats when it comes to elections. That's how Wilma Mankiller became chief, when her husband Charlie Soap carried in another box of ballots and said "Wait, we have another box."
Leave a comment:
-
-
Time to get this thread back onto the issue at hand
I know I know
Lots of finger pointing and yelling, name calling and hurt feelings
Sounds like another day in the trenches
I sat down and read H.R. 2824 which is the bill currently in the House of Reps sitting in committee
I read the whole document all the way to the end and will post it on here for you reading
It is very interesting reading
Here are the Highlights
1) It is a heavy handed way of getting the Cherokees back in line by removing all federal funding,Removing the ability of the tribe to continue its gaming operations so punishing the whole entire tribe by shutting down all funds for Schools, Hospitals ect.
2) Gives all Freedmen the right to SUE the Cherokee Nation the Dept of Interior separately or both
3) Gives the Government the right to hear Civil Rights violations which also could lead to Suits against the Cherokee Nation and or the Dept of Interior
4) If passed would also compel all other of the 5 civilized tribes to check on there Freedman status to make sure they are in compliance.
5) Has some very distrubing and Historically inaccurate information regarding the Cherokee Nation involvement during the Civil War by saying that all Cherokees were confederates and thus Slaveowners and were punished by the treaty of 1866 and this is just another case of southern politics
Thus we are racist exslave owners out to get the freedman back according to this bill!!!!!!
Holy Crap
Read the Bill
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by kgirl7 View PostDon't the Delawares have a say in their own self determination? How is it "fine" when the Delaware are made Cherokees against their own wishes?
And to the other person who posted... you cannot force part of your tribal citizens to live by a treaty (Delawares) and kick other parties to a treaty out of the tribe (Cherokee freedmen).
Leave a comment:
-
-
Ps:
Originally posted by John Cornsilk View PostWell mike graham, the african Cherokee that hawks chad smiths crap against the black Cherokee descendants of the Cherokee of the dawes era...
Mike Graham is the worst kind of a racist a black Cherokee with a CDIB Card NOT a freedman Smith cant do nothing about it, so he suckers Mike in to harrassing me where ever I go with smiths pure BS...The simple fact is the Freedmen, were made citizens of the Cherokee Nation by the 1866 Treaty, Mike Stupidly states "No where in the 1866 treaty is the word citizenship stated covering any Freedmen". Following that the Cherokee anmmended their 1839 Constitution See Article III, Section 5 to read the Cherokee law asserting the fact of law that the Freed blacks were Cherokee Citizens, in 1866...
As you can see if you went and read this amendment mirrored word for word the words of the 1866 Treaty. The Freedmen lived, birthed and died in the Cherokee Nation prior to 1901 as citizens of their Nation, the Cherokee Nation. The Dawes Commission had NOTHING to do with that.
It was the intent of Congress in 1901 to terminate the Cherokee Nation forever, make U.S. citizens of all the Cherokees including the Freedmen. If that had come to pass, none of us would be Cherokee Nation citizens. But Congress passed the Five Civilized Tribes Act (FCT) of 1906 continuing the governments of the FCT in perpetuity or until Congress deems otherwise (the Watson Bill may be that "otherwise"). It is the 1906 law that has allowed the Cherokee Nation to remain alive but dormant and the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma and chad Smith to usurp the Cherokee Peoples sovereign rights and violate treaty law, in the name of the dormant Cherokee Nation.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by Chad Woodsay View PostChad would say if you want the truth don't look on the Cornsilk board. All you will see there is a bunch of mean spirited malcontents bashing Cherokee people that just want to preserve their tribe and culture. John and others will get nasty with anyone that dares to have a different opinion. They don't have an objection to Indian Tribes being Indians because they always avoid disputing the facts in favor of personal attacks. That's why good people don't post there.
That's What!
Chad Woodsay
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by unitednative View PostCongresswoman Watson is not calling for the full restoration of the 1866 treaty, that action would mean that all the land that is now called the state of Oklahoma, would have to be turned back over to Indian nations that were forced to sign on to the 1866 treaty. No where in the 1866 treaty is the word citizenship stated covering any Freedmen.
Our sons and daughters today are giving their life for America on battlefields around the world against terrorism. It's a sick national joke that an elected member of the U.S. House of Congress would disgrace them with a resolution like H.R.2824.
Support stopping H.R.2824 Contact your congress person:
The Cherokee Nation -- Termination Bill H.R. 2824
Fact: Even in the federal government, voting is not a personal right, it's a privilege.
Fact: The Cherokee Nation Government in no way supported enslavement of any race of people.
Fact: No where in the 1866 treaty does it state "citizenship" for Freedmen, only protection and equal rights under tribal nation laws covering it's citizens.
Mike Graham is the worst kind of a racist a black Cherokee with a CDIB Card NOT a freedman Smith cant do nothing about it, so he suckers Mike in to harrassing me where ever I go with smiths pure BS...The simple fact is the Freedmen, were made citizens of the Cherokee Nation by the 1866 Treaty, Mike Stupidly states "No where in the 1866 treaty is the word citizenship stated covering any Freedmen". Following that the Cherokee anmmended their 1839 Constitution See Article III, Section 5 to read the Cherokee law asserting the fact of law that the Freed blacks were Cherokee Citizens, in 1866...
As you can see if you went and read this amendment mirrored word for word the words of the 1866 Treaty. The Freedmen lived, birthed and died in the Cherokee Nation prior to 1901 as citizens of their Nation, the Cherokee Nation. The Dawes Commission had NOTHING to do with that.
It was the intent of Congress in 1901 to terminate the Cherokee Nation forever, make U.S. citizens of all the Cherokees including the Freedmen. If that had come to pass, none of us would be Cherokee Nation citizens. But Congress passed the Five Civilized Tribes Act (FCT) of 1906 continuing the governments of the FCT in perpetuity or until Congress deems otherwise (the Watson Bill may be that "otherwise"). It is the 1906 law that has allowed the Cherokee Nation to remain alive but dormant and the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma and chad Smith to usurp the Cherokee Peoples sovereign rights and violate treaty law, in the name of the dormant Cherokee Nation.
Leave a comment:
-
Join the online community forum celebrating Native American Culture, Pow Wows, tribes, music, art, and history.
Related Topics
Collapse
-
by WhoMeAgain, I just got this in and was asked to post it. Whatcha' think???
____
Cherokee Citizens, please be on alert. The Tribe will, likely, need your assistance as we protect ourselves from another attack.
THOMAS (Library of Congr...-
Channel: Chit Chat
06-11-2009, 04:56 PM -
-
by FluteMakerThe Cherokee Freedmen, Native American Blood Quantum and the Akaka Bill
By Don Newman, 10/17/2007 5:16:50 PM
The controversy over the Cherokee freedmen is a perfect example of what could happen in Hawaii should the Akaka bill pass.
The Cherokee freedmen were black slaves...-
Channel: News
10-19-2007, 10:00 PM -
-
Cherokee Nation accepts Freedmen citizenship ruling
Thursday, March 9, 2006
The Cherokee Nation will abide by a court ruling that reaffirmed the citizenship rights of the Freedmen, the tribe's top legal official said on Wednesday.
In court, the tribe argued that...-
Channel: Native Issues
03-09-2006, 11:48 AM -
-
by JosiahI posted this as a follow up to the other posts that have been going around.
Very interesting Position the BIA is taking in all this!!!
TAHLEQUAH, Oka. — The Bureau of Indian Affairs has acknowledged that the federal government no longer has the authority to approve...-
Channel: News
08-13-2007, 09:35 PM -
Trending
Collapse
There are no results that meet this criteria.
Tag Cloud
Collapse
Sidebar Ad
Collapse
Leave a comment: