Perhaps rather than try to instruct about that which you have not lived, you could try for a teachable moment about cultural appropriation. While I understand a bit about the pedagogical theory behind living history reenactments, sometimes their use makes me a bit queasy.
First, there needs to be a line drawn between educational/recreational vs purely recreational reenactment. There is often a huge difference between level accuracy and cultural sensitivity shown between Renfairs full of turkey legs and "wenches" and Colonial Williamsburg. And, yes, I know this is not always the case. Heavens knows I've meet enough hobs who've told me as a modern Native I am totally ignorant of my culture, and without them it would all be lost and corrupted.
Second, I think there is a distinct difference when a group is "recreating" a tableau from their own culture vs another culture. Here is the delicate boundary, where education rapidly slides into appropriation. There needs to be a serious and honest examination of intention on the part of the sponsors and participants. If education is only a veneer over a wish-fulfillment, ethnic drag act, then the event is cultural appropriation pure and simple. But should education be the sincere intent, then the methodology needs to be examined. There are lessons learned beyond just those which are taught. When Native people are presented as a historical costume or an artifact, people learn to judge living modern Native people as somehow less than their museum counterpart. (And when the observer is a Native child, they are subtly dispossessed of their own past.)
But, setting aside the abstract issues. It sounds like you have a decent relationship with these people. Working from this you should be able to speak of your concerns and explain the issues. I can tell you from experience, you will need to address very fundamental differences in worldview. Starting with understandings of the sacred and intellectual property.
First, there needs to be a line drawn between educational/recreational vs purely recreational reenactment. There is often a huge difference between level accuracy and cultural sensitivity shown between Renfairs full of turkey legs and "wenches" and Colonial Williamsburg. And, yes, I know this is not always the case. Heavens knows I've meet enough hobs who've told me as a modern Native I am totally ignorant of my culture, and without them it would all be lost and corrupted.
Second, I think there is a distinct difference when a group is "recreating" a tableau from their own culture vs another culture. Here is the delicate boundary, where education rapidly slides into appropriation. There needs to be a serious and honest examination of intention on the part of the sponsors and participants. If education is only a veneer over a wish-fulfillment, ethnic drag act, then the event is cultural appropriation pure and simple. But should education be the sincere intent, then the methodology needs to be examined. There are lessons learned beyond just those which are taught. When Native people are presented as a historical costume or an artifact, people learn to judge living modern Native people as somehow less than their museum counterpart. (And when the observer is a Native child, they are subtly dispossessed of their own past.)
But, setting aside the abstract issues. It sounds like you have a decent relationship with these people. Working from this you should be able to speak of your concerns and explain the issues. I can tell you from experience, you will need to address very fundamental differences in worldview. Starting with understandings of the sacred and intellectual property.
Comment