No announcement yet.

conquered because of nonunification??

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • conquered because of nonunification??

    I am taking an anthropology class this semester as a prerequisite. My instructor said something in class the other day that has stuck in my mind and I thought that I would put the comment out there for everyone to give there perspective. "We would never be here if there was unity among all tribes that existed or exist.'' Everyone knows that I dont start up threads to often ( I like to read them;) and keep my thoughts to my self mainly:Angel: ) but, I thought this was a really interesting thread to start. What do you think would have happened if we were united as one from the start? She also says, " There still is no unity among tribes, and there lies the problem." So what do you have to say? She is Iroquois and majored in Native American History.
    Last edited by luvlumbee; 09-21-2002, 09:09 AM.
    Life is more than what we see...

  • #2
    Best example I can give of this is- if all the NDN's had banded together, they would have shot all the whites as they got off the boats ...... I'm sure if all our ancestors had done this, this country would have been totally different!

    Some of us would not exist, and others would have a different existance, I'm Irish/Scottish/Welsh/Blackfoot/Chicasas/Cherokee, more Cherokee than anything else, but no telling what else too!

    But since the Natives did not band together, some accepted the whites, while others fought them, and still others fought everybody!
    Your Heart Shows by how Your Words and Actions Affect Others.

    Nah I ain't NO WANNABE! I don't gotta wannabe when people wannabe like me!


    • #3
      I think the idea of unity among tribes goes deeper than just some accepting the whites and some not; I know it was specifically the ENMITY between tribes that led some to accept (or at least put up with) the whites in the first place - for instance, a number of the wabanaki tribes (like mine) saw the whites as a handy tool to help them fight their iroquois neighbors (specifically the mohawks). And I think the iroquois tribes were a primo example of that in their turn. Which just goes to show that there was never a concept of an "indian people", unified in beliefs, cultures and goals, in the minds of the peoples here.
      - zeph


      • #4
        Someone once told me that "So long as there are at least two people on the face of the Earth, there will never be complete unity".
        Just a quote that I thought kinda fit here. :)
        Wo shi mei you guo ren.


        • #5
          I look at east Asia as an example. Not Japan, who was militarily defeated by the U.S. after their "fax paux at Pearl Harbor". But I look at Vietnam. They were under the sovereignty of France until China sided with the communist elements and "liberated" them (by communist standards). The U.S. invaded to maintain white control, and lost. Today, many of these small countries: Vietnam, Cambodia, Korea, Laos, and the tribes therein, are maintaining somewhat traditional lifestyles even with the mix of technologies from around the world. Ditto for Africa. Yes, there are wars and intertribal conflicts, just like there were here and throughout Europe, always. It even goes on in the "good ol' U S of A". We have racism toward and from ALL races. The Bloods and Crips rule many urban neighborhoods, where cops fear to tread. Cops are not always trusted, either, especially in non-white ethnic communities. The only thing the United States and its Constitution add, are an untangible ideal and a Big Brother to PRETEND to enforce it while just exercising its power "just because it can".

          (After being asked, "What makes you such a threat?"): "We choose the right to be who we are. We know the difference between the illusion of freedom and the reality of freedom." - the character James Looks Twice in THUNDERHEART, release on film in 1992 (pseudo-representing Leonard Peltier in a story inspired by a collage of related events)
          #1 - We were not conquered. If we were conquered, there would be no reservations and our people would have been killed wholesale or COMPLETELY assimilated. Though much of this HAS happened, we still retain our National/Tribal identities and we DID force the USA to come to the bargaining table and sign treaties.

          #2 - Our loss of lands to the USA were because of poorly placed trust. We trusted the USA to keep its word. Founded by dishonorable fathers, the USA is a brood of liars that turned out to CHEAT us out of land. This was not the result of military battles worthy of story and song. Example: The P'Sqousa ("Wenatchee's") were NEVER at war with the USA, were promised a reservation they would remain soveriegn over, and Gov. Stevens screwed them out of it by delaying it survey until after the railroad was pushed through and farmers were allowed to settle its land. So now the farmers can cry, "We can't just be pushed off our land that we 'legally' settles or bought and paid for!"

          Hundreds of examples, known by most of the population but purposely ignored ("it doesn't matter now/that was long ago") PROVE this is true.

          The pro-American right radio pukes can stick that in their pipe and smoke it.
          Last edited by Wakalapi; 09-21-2002, 02:21 PM.
          "Friends don't let friends drink decaf..."
          Wakalapi's $49 unlimited phone service


          • #6
            ...we DID force the USA to come to the bargaining table and sign treaties.
            well, that's not entirely accurate... as messed up as it seems, the original purpose of forming treaties with native tribes here was specifically TO be able to then void those treaties and take the land. Under english law, it was illegal for colonists to simply take over land from people not considered sovereign nations... it was by forming treaties with those people that they were then recognized as nations able to treat with other nations - which then gave the english the "right" (under their laws) to declare war, invade, or take whatever action seemed advantageous to them. So at least in the beginning, in their dealings with the eastern tribes, the entire purpose of those treaties was to set the tribes up for a fall. I posted a link a long time ago to a detailed description of all this, I'll have to try and dig it up again.
            - zeph


            • #7
              Thanks, Zeph, I haven't heard that - but it all makes perfect sense.:Mad

              On small "however", though: after the Americans became independent and the U. S. Constitution was formed, treaties were meant to avoid provoking Indians into wars. Once again, if the Americans were that confident that they could so easily whole-slaughter us, they would not have offered to make peace at all. They would have marched on the rampage. Because this did not happen, the Americans cannot claim to have "conquered" us. That was really my point, next time you hear a wasicu make the assertion that we were conquered fair and square.
              Last edited by Wakalapi; 09-22-2002, 01:47 AM.
              "Friends don't let friends drink decaf..."
              Wakalapi's $49 unlimited phone service


              • #8
                but it all makes perfect sense
                right, I knew that would make it all clear! :Chatter
                actually, after I posted I realized you were talking about the USA and I was talking about way before, I was just too lazy to go back and delete my post...

                edited to get the smilie to work
                Last edited by zeph; 09-22-2002, 02:49 AM.
                - zeph


                • #9
                  The way I see it is that if we were to have been united the whole unification process would have taken us in one of two directions. On the one hand, we would have become just as warlike and empirical as the whites were, and would have caused a war that would not have stopped until one side got tired of killing the other, or simply annihlated each other. Given the white people's tendancy towards empire building, they probably would have kept sending poor peasants to their deaths until there were no more natives left to oppose them. The other possible direction is that we would have been so pacifist and open minded that we would have allowed them to walk on in and take over, little by little, without us realizing it, until they had everything and we had nothing. Now those aren't the only two possible scenarios, but the most plausable two that I could come up with... Just my thoughts on this hypothetical situation, hey I could be totally wrong too. :D
                  Words from just north of tha border.........


                  • #10
                    And if a frog had wings . . .


                    • #11
                      Maybe we could just blame it all on poor immigration policy that began in the early 1490's.
                      "Friends don't let friends drink decaf..."
                      Wakalapi's $49 unlimited phone service


                      • #12

                        Another thought. I'm really not sure unification would have help'd y'all anyway. European technology and society were far ahead of Native, in terms of weapons and population. Not to mention our myriad diseases. You never stood a chance. We outnumbered you, and outgunned you, and out virused you. Although the biological warfare was completely unintentional, it was certainly a significant factor. There was simply no way a pre-industrial civilization and a tribal one were going to be able to co-exist on the same continent, and the one with the guns was gonna win. Now, had the tribes here managed to unify a thousand years or so before we got here, and entertain some agriculture to support a much higher population base, then this'd prolly be a much different place.

                        Build a man a fire and you warm him for a night. Set a man on fire and you warm him for the rest of his life.


                        • #13
                          Well if it wasnt for the diseases they never would have succeeded.

                          The english just couldnt make it on their own without our help
                          If we werent already wiped out by disease they wouldnt be here.
                          Our fighting abilities were vastly superior to a shoot and reload once every minute crap.

                          Plus T Dave we had the most advance agritculture in the world where have you been?


                          • #14
                            If only Tecumseh had different would things be now?....

                            "President ThunderHorse will be visiting with King Muhammed of Saudi Arabia for peace talks while while Vice President LooksTwice is spearheading the campaing against terrorism at home. Thank you for watching CNN, More details at 11..
                            A Warrior without character is nothing more than a brute.

                            I have lots of freinds, you just cant see them:)


                            • #15
                              Biological warfare was completely unintentional


                              Join the online community forum celebrating Native American Culture, Pow Wows, tribes, music, art, and history.

                              Related Topics


                              • StephanieWho
                                Trying to make sense of a land area and it's usage
                                by StephanieWho
                                I live in the foothills of the Ouachita Mountains, and spend about 6 days a week up there with my husband. (He trains squirrel dogs) Through the years we have found a major assortment of ground finds that show up after a good rain. I know we are live in Caddo territory, and have done some research,...
                                03-14-2018, 09:24 PM
                              • justluke
                                Peoples of southwestern Pennsylvania
                                by justluke
                                This is my first post here, and I hope this is an appropriate place to ask this. I'm not native (at least that I know of) but I have always had a thirst for knowledge, and in particular an interest in teaching my 5 year old daughter all that I can. She had asked about the Native Americans, the people...
                                12-20-2012, 02:13 PM
                              • lostsalt
                                Traditionalism vs. Assimulation/Pan-Indianism
                                by lostsalt
                                Okay, let bring this subject out in the open. It has been overtaking other legit threads.
                                So here it is, take off the ignore lists, refrain from personal attacks and name calling. Let everyone have their say without personal judgment. Let us give this discussion the attention it deserves....
                                08-01-2007, 02:15 PM
                              • Calista2015
                                Can someone please anwer this about American Indian religion?
                                by Calista2015
                                Forget I even asked, some people here seem to have such attitudes when asking about how to practice Native American spirituality. Why ask? Because one GENERALLY does not know. I wasn't being racist or racially bias, I was telling of the experience I came upon, upon hearing from a group called Hebrew...
                                06-05-2015, 10:39 AM
                              • Renard
                                Frenchman from Paris
                                by Renard
                                Hi everyone,

                                I'm Alexandre, 26, I'm French and I live in Paris.

                                I happen to speak pretty good English as I've studied the language in the university five years.

                                I've joined this forum because I'm really interested to learn more about the culture, traditions,...
                                11-12-2017, 01:55 PM



                              There are no results that meet this criteria.

                              Sidebar Ad