Very good post. It will be interesting to see what some of the poeple on this list will say.
As for me, I will say that there is a tendancy for Cheyenne lane stitch to be more flat than other styles. This is partially due to the technique employed. Cheyenne's occasionally used what some people call "loop stitch." It's not a very good term though.
The flatness of the beadwork is a minor characteristic at best. For example, many Sioux pieces are as flat (or flatter), and Cheyenne work is occasionally very "humped." I would say that flatness would be a supportive characteristic in identifying Cheyenne beadwork. In other words, I would not hinge an "Is it Sioux or Cheyenne?" question solely on the flatness of the lanes. Is this what you are after, or am I way off.
By the way, what sources are you using?
PC
[ March 29, 2001: Message edited by: Pochahontas ]
As for me, I will say that there is a tendancy for Cheyenne lane stitch to be more flat than other styles. This is partially due to the technique employed. Cheyenne's occasionally used what some people call "loop stitch." It's not a very good term though.
The flatness of the beadwork is a minor characteristic at best. For example, many Sioux pieces are as flat (or flatter), and Cheyenne work is occasionally very "humped." I would say that flatness would be a supportive characteristic in identifying Cheyenne beadwork. In other words, I would not hinge an "Is it Sioux or Cheyenne?" question solely on the flatness of the lanes. Is this what you are after, or am I way off.
By the way, what sources are you using?
PC
[ March 29, 2001: Message edited by: Pochahontas ]
Comment